tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post6051636892089552953..comments2023-07-28T07:12:45.810-03:00Comments on NORVAL MORRISSEAU BLOG: >>> Otavnik Vs Sinclair SC 09-00082782-0000 (Part VI)Spirit Walkerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03353827718431536386noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post-59285486150586094812011-02-15T13:20:18.611-04:002011-02-15T13:20:18.611-04:00>>>
The following is a comment by Bryant ...>>><br />The following is a comment by Bryant Ross of 'Coghlan Art Studio & Gallery' from Aldergrove, BC posted elswhere in the Blogosphere:<br /><br />" The current posting on the UGO blog contains so much BS in it that it defies description. The person that wrote it speaks more about what he thinks should have been said at the trial than what was said. And then he doesn't have the balls to sign his name to it.<br /><br />Two things from the posting jump out at me.<br /><br />1/ Richie Sinclair was not forced to take his web sites down by a judge. He took them down on his own accord.<br />~ http://norvalmorrisseau.blogspot.com/2011/01/jail-or-bail-for-ritchie-sinclair-aka.html<br /><br />2/ The painting in question with Jonathan Browne is specifically mentioned in a sworn and notorized affidavit by Norval Morrisseau as a painting not done by the artist.<br />~ http://norvalmorrisseau.blogspot.com/2011/01/inconsistencies-of-norval-morrisseaus.html<br /><br />Cheers<br />Bryant Ross - Coghlan Art"<br /><br />BLOG MASTER'S COMMENT: If you examine links noted below items 1/ & 2/ it is going to be clear that Bryant Ross’ statements are false. <br /><br />In the meantime I strongly recommend readers to examine previously presented post:<br /><br />http://norvalmorrisseau.blogspot.com/2011/01/is-nmhs-silence-golden_20.html <br /><br />and corresponding reference posts - to fully understand the extent of Bryant Ross' deceptions and disrespectful behaviours towards Norval Morrisseau’s artwork(s). <br /><br />Miigwetch, SW<br /><br />P.S. I invite Bryant Ross to acquire court transcripts of the above presented case and I will present it on this platform for all to see.Spirit Walkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03353827718431536386noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post-51178463316072216732011-01-30T15:01:07.561-04:002011-01-30T15:01:07.561-04:00In fact, Ritchie Sinclair complained to the court ...In fact, Ritchie Sinclair complained to the court that Joseph Otavnik deliberately tricked him by putting the painting that is the subject of this court case on the Ugo Matulić's NORVAL MORRISSEAU BLOG, without identifying the owner, knowing that Ritchie Sinclair would post it as a fake (which Ritchie Sinclair did the next day) just so that Joseph Otavnik could sue him. Ritchie Sinclair complained to the judge that he was “had” and it wasn’t fair.<br /><br />This one really takes the cake. The above paragraph I quoted above states that dummy Ritchie Stardreamer Sinclair says he was 'had' or tricked?<br /><br />Yeah, it's ok for you to destroy many other people's lives Ritchie isn't it? You were grabing at straws Sinclair. The court should of fined you for contempt! Hours and hours of deliberation and adjornment after adjornment on your part with unrelated information. You really pissed off the judge. You even harrassed Joe Otavnik's key witness 'Joseph McLeod' and was charged accordingly.<br /><br />SPQRAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post-81853254548007320512011-01-28T15:48:06.456-04:002011-01-28T15:48:06.456-04:00>>>
If Mr. Michael Moniz sends me all per...>>><br />If Mr. Michael Moniz sends me all pertinent information to his intended presentation I will provide him the platform of the NORVAL MORRISSEAU BLOG to ‘speak’ freely concerning the Norval Morrisseau Authenticity and all other issues that will assist readers/collectors in better understanding of complex nature of the Norval morrisseau Art Market.<br /><br />* All of the information will be presented in its true form unedited.<br /><br />P.S. All contributions from other readers/collectors are welcome!<br /><br />Migwetch, SWSpirit Walkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03353827718431536386noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post-83438233942234744952011-01-28T12:46:29.217-04:002011-01-28T12:46:29.217-04:00I am requesting Mr.Matulic that you allow me to wr...I am requesting Mr.Matulic that you allow me to write up a summary article that will addendum information pertaining to this issue in regards to Dr.Johnathan Browne's painting. My article will examine and critique this individual who sought to damage my business and the art of Norval Morrisseau.<br /><br />Kind regards<br />Michael MonizAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post-72881987943449767032011-01-27T14:19:55.972-04:002011-01-27T14:19:55.972-04:00Jonathan B is known by many as the man who made hi...Jonathan B is known by many as the man who made himself famous in the Morrisseau art scene and on the worldwide internet, as a strong member of the group denouncing all the so-called “Morrisseau fakes,” by launching his “www.morrisseaubuyersbeware.com,” all based on his experience with one painting from Bearclaw Gallery, that by his own admission to the Ottawa Citizen, he had spectacularly failed to get proven as a fake by any reputable authority.<br /> <br />It would be extremely interesting to know, what happened to this Morrisseau painting, which Bearclaw and Joseph Otavnik swore was genuine, and Jonathan B and JW strongly declared was a “fake.” Do they still own it today? <br /> <br />Or did JB and JW dispose of a painting they considered to be a fake, to third parties for a minimal amount, as a fake - as people of principle would - good only as fire starter?<br /> <br />Or did they dispose of it as a genuine Morrisseau, for a lot of money, by hiding their true feelings from an unwitting buyer, unaware about what they really thought about its actual worth?<br /><br />Concerned collectorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5722577745830268902.post-43704410553747498772011-01-26T09:45:06.645-04:002011-01-26T09:45:06.645-04:00Don Robinson came into this court case with his so...Don Robinson came into this court case with his so called 'expert forensic report' to help save Ritchie and himself. The only problem with this report made by Don Robinson was that he is no expert in forensics? He has no credentials to that effect. He thought he could fool the judge into thinking so.<br /> Sadly Mr.Otavnik never had a professional forensic report of his own on this painting which would have tipped the scales in his favour quite easily.<br /><br />SPQRAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com