>>> Ugo Matulic wins $1,000,000 SLAPP suit against Kinsman Robinson Galleries (Part II)

-
Kinsman Robinson Galleries vs. Ugo Matulic /CV-10-417123/

Below, a totally triumphant Ugo Matulic, in a court proceeding, launched by the Kinsman Robinson Galleries (behind him), Donald Robinson, and Paul Robinson, who had sued him for a MILLION DOLLARS for defamation etc. (See: Robinson Family Court Claims Totally Destroyed by Ugo Matulic)



   Image: Courtesy of http://themorrisseauhoaxexposedblog.com/

SLAPP suit Target Ugo Matulic, of Calgary, Alberta, outside Toronto’s Kinsman Robinson Galleries, is famous in Canadian history as the first person ever taken to court by the Morrisseau Conspiracy Theorists.

Though the Conspiracy Theorists have had 13 years to take “thousands of forgeries and umpteen forgers” to court they have never done it, even once, knowing full well they have no believable independently verifiable evidence, of any kind, about forgers or forgeries, that will hold up in any court.

Trying to “Kill the Messengers” with SLAPP Suits - Instead, Donald Robinson, the Principal Conspiracy Theorist, and Paul Robinson, the Junior Morrisseau Conspiracy Theorist, both of whom work inside this gallery – alongside John MacGregor Newman, the Principal Blogging Conspiracy Theorist – have started to “Shoot the Messenger,” by targeting Morrisseau researchers and investigative journalists, to try to shut them up, and stop them from exposing what Donald Robinson himself told Judge Paul Martial, was “the greatest fraud in Canadian art history.”

Though Kinsman Robinson Galleries web blogs have personally accused Matulic of being an “ignorant Croatian,” Matulic is a shining example of how passionate new Canadians have immeasurably helped to enrich the cultural life of Canada.

Cultural Genocide - Ugo Matulic has amassed what can only be called a stunning collection of compromising documentary evidence that catalogues the history of the biggest hoax, as well as the biggest act of cultural genocide, in Canadian history.

Matulic, whose public-spirited generosity, in paying for dozens of expensive independent forensic analyses, by top independent Canadian forensic scientists, to analyze alleged “forgeries” – many belonging to other people, including strangers he did not know - has panicked the Conspiracy Theorists big time and caused them to take diabolical actions to try to stem the flow of damaging information that is unravelling their Hoax, big time.

Every single “forgery” Kinsman Robinson Galleries Conspiracy Theorists have alleged, over the years, has been, without a single exception, ruled “authentic,” with DNA certainty, by top Canadian forensic experts. Some 70 times so far… and counting…

In 2010 Kinsman Robinson Galleries of Toronto launched a SLAPP suit against Matulic in Ontario Superior Court to try to shut him up and stop his public-spirited investigation into alleged frauds in the Morrisseau art market.

For the definitive data bank on documents, pictures, and reports, from five years of research into the life and art of Norval Morrisseau, compiled by Ugo Matulic, go to:

Norval Morrisseau Blog

 



Source: theMorrisseauHoaxExposedBlog.com

 

>>> On December 22, 2009 the Supreme Court of Canada has released a very significant decision which affects all media news reporting companies and bloggers in Canada: "Journalists and other media, including bloggers, will be protected from lawsuits if they diligently try to verify information on matters that are in the public interest." 

"These rulings have caused a fundamental change in Canada’s defamation law. While journalists, bloggers and others do not have free reign to impugn the reputations of others, the notions of free speech and freedom of expression have been broadened to ensure a more vigorous debate of political and other issues that are clearly important to society." Arthur Weinreb

... for more information click HERE and/or HERE.


>>> REFERENCE POSTS (STRONGLY RECOMMENDED):
- Ugo Matulic wins $1,000,000 SLAPP suit against Kinsman Robinson Galleries (Part I), - Law Tips for Bloggers (Part III) /SLAPP Suits/, - Ugo Matulić's response to Kinsman Robinson Galleries, Donald C. Robinson & Paul C. H. Robinson, - Ugo Matulić's response to yet another "Notice of Libel" by Kinsman Robinson Galleries, Kinsman Robinson Galleries threatens SLAPP suit against Ugo Matulić for $ 1 Million (Part I), - Grant v. Torstar and the defence of responsible communication: implications for bloggers and users of other online media, - Forensic Document Examination (Part I), - Signatures on Norval Morrisseau artworks certified by Forensic Science, - Morrisseau's artwork in Auction Houses, Commercial Art Galleries & Museums Around the World, - Genuine Morrisseau paintings: Appraised, Authenticated and Forensically Analyzed... /In regards to the Genuine Norval Morrisseau paintings signed by the artist with a dry brush (DB) technique/ - Experts in Norval Morrisseau's Art (Part I) /Ref.: Mr. Joseph McLeod/ - Norval Morrisseau authenticating his artworks /In regards to the Genuine Norval Morrisseau paintings signed by the artist with a dry brush (DB) technique/, - Endorsement by Thunder Bay Art Gallery of genuine Morrisseau paintings from 1970's /In regards to the Genuine Norval Morrisseau paintings signed by the artist with a dry brush (DB) technique/, - Authenticity Statement by Mr. Goyce Kakegamic /'In regards to Genuine Norval Morrisseau paintings acquired from Collections of Mr. Rolf Schneiders and Mr. Gary Lamont/, - Statutory Declaration by Mr. Robert Scott, /' Witnessing Norval Morrisseau signing the paintings with a dry brush (DB) technique'/, - Statutory Declaration by Mr. Deiter John Voss, /' Witnessing Norval Morrisseau signing the paintings with a dry brush (DB) technique'/ - Hatfield, Margaret Lorraine vs. Child, Donna and Artworld of Sherway (Part IV) & - Pivotal Court Case Relevant to Authenticity of Norval Morrisseau Artworks.
 

 

 

"THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THIS PLATFORM IS BASED ON DATA COLLECTED FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND OTHER VERIFIABLE SOURCES WHICH CAN BE PUT FORTH ACCORDINGLY AS SUBMISSIBLE EVIDENCE IN A CANADIAN COURT OF LAW IF THE NEED SHOULD ARISE AGAIN."

-